In Arkansas, drug trafficking is a serious crime that can result in severe penalties. Protecting your liberty requires building a defense that addresses the key factors of such crimes.
Courts often focus on the concept of intent when determining whether an individual is guilty of drug trafficking. Understanding how intent plays a role in these convictions can help you refute drug trafficking charges.
What is intent in a drug trafficking case?
Intent refers to the state of mind of the accused at the time of the alleged crime. In Arkansas drug trafficking cases, the prosecution must prove that you intended to distribute or sell illegal substances. Simply possessing a large quantity of drugs may not be enough to secure a conviction for trafficking. Intent separates drug trafficking and simple possession, which carries less severe penalties.
How do prosecutors prove intent?
Prosecutors often rely on circumstantial evidence to establish intent. This evidence may include the amount of drugs found, the presence of packaging materials or large sums of cash. For example, the prosecution might claim that finding multiple bags of a controlled substance alongside scales and money indicates an intention to distribute the drugs.
Can you prove a lack of drug trafficking intent?
When facing drug charges, it is important to establish that you had no intent to sell or distribute the drugs. This might entail asserting that the drugs were solely for personal use or that you did not know the drugs were in your possession. Successfully proving a lack of intent can result in a reduced charge or even an acquittal.
The role of intent in Arkansas drug trafficking convictions highlights the importance of the prosecution’s burden to prove that the accused planned to distribute or sell illegal substances. Without sufficient evidence of intent, a trafficking charge may not stand, ensuring that you can return to a life of normalcy.